½²×ùÖ÷Ì⣺Rocking Shallow Foundation for improved seismic performance of soil-structure system£¨Ò¡°Ú»ù´¡£º¿¹Õ𹤳ÌÉè¼ÆµÄÐÂÀíÄ
ר¼ÒÐÕÃû£ºLijun Deng
¹¤×÷µ¥Î»£º¼ÓÄô󰢶û²®Ëþ´óѧ
½²×ùʱ¼ä£º2024Äê08ÔÂ01ÈÕ09:30-10:30
½²×ùµØµã£ºÍÁľѧԺA302
Ö÷°ìµ¥Î»£º×ðÁú¿Ê±¹ÙÍøÍÁľ¹¤³ÌѧԺ
ÄÚÈÝÕªÒª£º
The design of conventional shallow foundations is well known to geotechnical engineers, owing to the contributions of Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Vesic, and so on. The foundations are designed for the bearing capacity (a.k.a. ultimate limit state) and settlement (a.k.a., serviceability limit state); the serviceability usually governs and often results in an excessively large factor of safety against the bearing failure. Such foundations are considered ¡°fixed¡± base. The philosophy of fixed-base foundations sometimes led to surprisingly poor performance of soil-structure systems when an earthquake struck, as observed in many case studies. The opposite philosophy, which allows the uplift and detachment of shallow foundations (termed ¡°rocking foundations¡±), has drawn the attention of researchers and practitioners. The idea of rocking foundation has been accepted in the seismic design guides of Canada, USA, and New Zealand. However, further research is needed to delineate the engineering performance. This seminar will introduce a research program on the performance of full-scale rocking systems subjected to cyclic loads in the field, carried out at UAlberta. The systems consist of a concrete footing, column, and superstructure mass. The performance indicators, including capacities, damping ratios, residual settlement, residual rotation, were quantified to pave the road for subsequent design procedures. Particularly, a method was developed to quantify the capacity of rocking foundations subjected to oblique cyclic loads.
Ö÷½²È˽éÉÜ£º
µËÀö¾ü£¬¼ÓÄô󰢶û²®Ëþ´óѧÍÁľÓë»·¾³¹¤³Ìϵ¸±½ÌÊÚ£¬2013Äê³õÈëÖ°°¢¶û²®Ëþ´óѧ¡£2012Ä격ʿ±ÏÒµÓÚ¼ÓÖÝ´óѧ´÷ά˹·ÖУ£¬2006ºÍ2003Äê»ñÇ廪´óѧˮÀû¹¤³Ìϵ˶ʿºÍ±¾¿ÆÑ§Î»¡£ÑÒÍÁ¹¤³Ì·½Ïò£¬Ö÷ÒªÑо¿ÁìÓò°üÀ¨»ù´¡¹¤³Ì£¬ÍÁÓë½á¹¹Ï໥×÷Óã¬ÑÒÍÁ¹¤³ÌÀëÐÄ»úÄ£Ä⣬ÍÁ¶¯Á¦Ñ§£¬º®ÇøÑÒÍÁ¹¤³ÌµÈ¡£Ä¿Ç°ÒѶÀÁ¢Ö¸µ¼²©Ê¿Éú£¨ÔÚ¶ÁºÍÒѱÏÒµ£©°ËÃû£¬Ë¶Ê¿Éú½ü¶þÊ®Ãû£¬Ö§³Ö·ÃÎÊѧÉúѧÕß12Ãû¡£¹²·¢±íÆÚ¿¯ÂÛÎÄ50ÓàÆª¡£»ñµÃ¶àÏî¼ÓÄôó»ù½ð¼°¹¤Òµ½çÏîĿ֧³ÖÏîÄ¿£¬×Ü×ÊÖú½ð¶î³¬¹ý300Íò¼ÓÔª¡£Á½´Î»ñÑÒÍÁÐÐҵлáÆÚ¿¯Canadian Geotechnical Journal Editor's Choice½±Àø£¬2019Äê»ñÎ÷°Ä´óÀûÑÇ´óѧGledden Senior Fellowship½±Àø£¬ÂÛÎÄ£¨Óں͵Ë2007£©»ñÁìÅÜÕß5000ÊÕ¼¡£ÏÖÈÎÐÐÒµ¶¥¼¶ÆÚ¿¯Canadian Geotechnical Journal ¸±Ö÷±à£¬µ£ÈμÓÄôóÑÒÍÁ¹¤³ÌлáÍÁÁ¦Ñ§Óë»ù´¡¹¤³Ì·Ö»áÖ÷ϯ£¨2023-2024£©£¬ÔøÈΰ¢¶û²®Ëþ¼ÓÄôó»ªÈ˽ÌÊÚлá(ACCP)Ö÷ϯ£¨2020-2022£©¡£